Wednesday, September 30, 2009

MAHATHIR’S SELECTIVE AMNESIA ON THE I.S.A.

MAHATHIR’S SELECTIVE AMNESIA ON THE I.S.A.

By Dr Kua Kia Soong, Director of SUARAM, 30 September 2009

Throughout his autocratic reign, Dr Mahathir displayed contempt for the rule of law. Some say he was ignorant of this principle of democratic governance, confounding it with “rule by law”. His frontal assault on the Malaysian judiciary in 1988 was an embarrassment for the nation so much so that his successor had to atone for this injury to “national security” twenty years later.


In his recent blog on the justification for the ISA, Dr Mahathir further demonstrates his failure to appreciate the rule of law with this give-away: “Courts take a long time to pass judgement.” He tries in vain to justify his use of this “Insidious Suppression Apparatus” especially during Operation Lalang. He claims that he was trying to save the nation from a catastrophic clash because UMNO was threatening to hold a million-strong demonstration, that leaders of both sides of the political divide were detained and “as soon as that threat passed, the detainees were released…”


As a human rights watcher since the Sixties and a victim of Operation Lalang myself, allow me to expose some gross misrepresentation of the facts by the former premier:


Fact 1: What did UMNO want to demonstrate against to warrant a million-strong force?


As I told my Special Branch interrogators, the freedom of assembly extends as far as the police are capable of handling the demonstration in question. From what Dr Mahathir has said, it seems clear that UMNO (and he was the UMNO chief!) was bent on creating terror. In fact, on the day the Chinese associations were holding their assembly at the Tian Hou Temple in October 19887 to protest the appointment of non-Mandarin educated administrators to Chinese schools, I was busy papering over the glass windows of my office at the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall in preparation of this threatening demonstration by UMNO.


The million-strong UMNO demonstration did not happen because it had been orchestrated, just as May 13, 1969 was orchestrated. We had a glimpse of what UMNO was capable of doing when a few hundred UMNO Youth louts demonstrated outside the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall over the Suqiu issue on 18 August 2000 and threatened to burn down the assembly hall.


On October 27th 1987, Operation Lalang was unleashed to create this “white terror” and it did the job to allow Dr Mahathir to launch his assault on the judiciary and to solve the UMNO dilemma posed by the challenge of Team B in UMNO.


Fact 2: Why was I and many others detained under Operation Lalang?


Dr Mahathir claims the ISA is a preventive law “to be applied before a crime is committed.” That was why people like me, Chandra Muzaffar, Lim Kit Siang, Karpal Singh, Dr Nasir Hashim and a hundred or more others were detained?


No, from the interrogation by the Special Branch, I was detained to punish me for writing all those provocative articles in the newspapers during the Eighties and writing the book on “The Root Causes of Racial Polarisation in Malaysia”.


“Okay, “I told my Special Branch tormentors, “If you say my book was a threat to national security, then ban it! You can’t say the book is fine but then arrest me for being a threat to national security!”


I pointed out that Dr Mahathir’s “Malay Dilemma” was banned because it was considered unsavoury to the Tunku’s administration but it wasn’t banned!


Do you see the chop logic of the ISA justificators?


Clearly, from talking to the other detainees during Operation Lalang, the ISA was used to punish us all for not falling in line with the Barisan Nasional. In fact, part of the so-called “rehabilitation” by the Special Branch was to encourage me to emigrate and stop being a thorn in the side of the Mahathir regime! So much for 1Malaysia and trying to attract Malaysians back to our country!


Fact 3: Why were no BN leaders sent to Kamunting Detention Camp?


Dr Mahathir appears to be suffering from the common complaint among the ruling elite – selective amnesia. He said, “As soon as the threat passed, the detainees were released.”


How can we expect young Malaysians to take an interest in history and human rights if a former prime minister tells such blatant untruths?


During my sixty days of solitary confinement, that was the line I took with my Special Branch tormentors: “Okay, assuming you are right about detaining us…Now that the so-called crisis is over, shouldn’t we be released?”


I expected to be released after the sixty days of solitary confinement but the only people released included ALL the Barisan Nasional leaders who had been taken in. The rest of us who were being punished for being dissidents were sent on two-year orders to Kamunting. There was not a single BN leader sent to Kamunting even though the MCA and Gerakan supported the Chinese associations over the Chinese schools issue.


Clearly, one is considered a threat to national security only if one is opposed to the Barisan Nasional. Then again, there is a difference in treatment meted out to detainees from the BN and the rest of us. I happened to be in the next cell to a datuk from the BN and I could hear his high spirits every time he was brought back from “questioning”. Clearly, while the rest of us to subjected to harrowing questioning and some, even horrendous torture, these BN detainees were being taken out and feted!


Fact 4: Torture under the ISA has been going on for years, including under Operation Lalang.


Dr Mahathir chides the US for torturing their detainees. Does he not know that the Malaysian police have been torturing detainees for years? One only needs to look at the statutory declarations by Dr Munawar Anees and others detained in the last ten years on the internet to see the depravity of our state torturers. One of the earliest documents I have seen is this excerpt from a statement by “political prisoners of Kawasan A, B, and C” dated 1 May 1969, Batu Gajah Detention Camp:


“1. We political detainees have undergone days and nights of endless interrogation which have inflicted grave toll on the mental condition of many detainees;

2. During interrogation, we have been handcuffed, had our abdominal parts kicked, our heads bashed against the wall until they bled, and some have had to be hospitalised;

3. We have had needles stuck in our fingernails and pencils used to squeeze our fingers between them;

4. We have been burnt with cigarette lighters and hit with elastic bands; some have had nails inserted into their genitals;

5. We have been asked to strip off our pants and to sit on open bottles;

6. We have been made to take off our clothing and to stand before fans and air conditioners until we have passed out;

7. The Banishment Law has been invoked to force political detainees out of the country, while those who do not accept banishment are kept on long-term detentions. Some at Seremban Detention Camp have already been detained for between ten to twenty years already;

8. We political prisoners here have been detained for between four to eight years without trial;

9. The riot squad has been mobilised to storm our detention camp in order to force those who have refused to wear handcuffs when they leave the camp to do so. In the process, there has been bloodshed;

10. Health and medical services are very poor in the camp. Those who leave for hospital treatment are forced to be handcuffed. After nine o’clock, we are forced into hot and stuffy cells…”


On Dr Mahathir’s own watch during the Operation Lalang he unleashed, this is the affidavit of Yeshua Jamaluddin, who was detained for being a Malay Christian convert. One might pose this question to our former premier. How was Yeshua a threat to national security during that particular moment in time?


His affidavit at his Habeas Corpus hearing in October 1988 is surely comparable to what was inflicted on the Guantanamo detainees:


“I was not allowed to sleep for days at a stretch and was warned that I would not get any food if I did not cooperate. One Inspector Yusoff also threatened to disturb my girlfriend if I did not give any information. I was assaulted by Inspectors Yusoff, Zainuddin, Ayub and another officer on a number of occasions. On one occasion I was knocked to the ground and injured my back. Since then, I have been passing blood in my urine and have been suffering from pains in my lower back constantly…


“On another occasion during interrogation, Inspector Yusoff forced me to strip naked and to enact the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. Inspector Yusoff also forced me to crawl on the floor in a naked state…”


“A police constable forced me to stand on one leg with both my arms outstretched holding my slippers. He made me remain in this position for two hours. He then called in a woman constable and her young daughter and asked them to look at me saying: “This Malay is not aware of who he is. He changed his religion. He has no shame!” (Kua, K.S., “445 Days Behind the Wire”,1999: 194)


Is there any wonder the Malaysian government has still not ratified the Convention against Torture? If Dr Mahathir is so incensed about the US torturing detainees, why didn’t he ratify the Convention against Torture during his watch?


Fact 5: The ISA has been a convenient tool to be used by the ruling BN coalition against detractors


The primary function of the ISA is to terrorise Malaysians. We have all grown up in the terrorising shadow of the ISA – the solitary confinement, the torture with impunity, the renewable years of detention…When I was sent to Kamunting detention camp on 27 December 1987, my room mate was Loh Ming Liang – he had been detained for 16 years! Such deterrence is part of the terrorising intent of the ISA.


The ISA is clearly a blatant abuse of human rights and has no place in a society that claims to be morally and spiritually upright.

Monday, September 28, 2009

FFF coming soon!



Catch the
FreedomFilmFest 2009
Presenting 23 heart-moving, eye-opening, award-winning human rights documentaries from Malaysia and around the world, over 3 days in 4 states.
2-4TH OCTOBER 2009, The Annexe, Central Market KL
9-11 OCTOBER 2009, Han Chiang College, Penang
23-25TH OCOTBER, Tropical Inn, Johor Baharu
30 OCTOBER-1 NOVEMBER, Chung Hwa middle School 1, Kuching
WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR?
COMMUNITY VIDEO FORUM & SCREENINGS (Friday, 3-6pm) KL only
Community Video Forum & Showcase will be bringing to you a sharing session of experience and video showcase between community filmmakers and activists from Malaysia and around the SEA region who use video for community organising.
LAUNCH CEREMONY & OPENING FILM (Friday, 8 pm)
The 6th FreedomFilmFest2009 will be launched with the screening of AT STAKE, a brave and eye-opening documentary tackling taboo issues faced by Indonesian women. This anthology covers issues of female genital mutilation, unmarried women's experiences at the gynecologist, prostitution, and the sexuality of a migrant worker.
*Producer NIA DINATA, who is the director of the movie “Berbagi Suami” and also a reknowned Indonesian feminist will be present in KL for Q&A after the screening.
PREMIERE OF FFF2009 FILMS! (Saturday, 7pm)
Al-Fatehah Memali by Rahmat Haron
This film portrays the journey of singer-songwriters, Black and Meor, trying to comprehend a massacre that happened in 1985 in Kg. Memali, Kedah. Their journey brings them to the village where they meet survivors and witnesses of the tragedy to uncover a forgotten story of injustice for most of Malaysia, but one forever etched in the hearts of those in Memali.
Kayuh by Soh Sook Hwa
This film is a first-hand account of a 100-strong contingent of cyclists in the JERIT cycling campaign who rode from Alor Setar and Johor Baharu to Kuala Lumpur for 16 days in order to address 6 major concerns of marginalized groups in Malaysia.
No Silver Lining: The Perak Crisis by The S-ploited.
What happens when “frogs” jump over to the other side? In Perak, when 3 elected representatives of the Pakatan Rakyat 'hopped” over to become BN friendly, it started a political wrestling match for power between the two opposing political alliance.
* Entry is FREE but strictly by invitation only as it is a closed-door private event.
For inquiries and reservations of passes: Please email freedomfilmfest@komas.org or call 017-316..., with the following information.
Name l Contact tel. no and email l Title of film/time of session that you would like to watch l Number of passes needed l In which state(KL, PG, JB, or KUCHING)
Disclaimer:
Selection of films and program of the festival are the sole responsibility of the organising committee of the FreedomFilmFest.
The venue providers are not involved in this process of selection and cannot be held accountable.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

BARBARISM OF THE HIGHLAND CLEARANCES IN SARAWAK

BARBARISM OF THE HIGHLAND CLEARANCES IN SARAWAK
By Dr Kua Kia Soong, Director of SUARAM, 19 September 2009
Nearly fifty years after independence for Sarawak, we see a comparison with “Highland Clearances” in Scotland during the 18th century when the highlanders were driven off their lands for capitalistic sheep farming. The English did it with brutality and thoroughness through “butcher” Lord Cumberland and even obliterated the “wild” Celtic mode of life.
What we have seen in Sarawak recently has the same capitalist logic, namely, to drive the indigenous peoples out of their native customary lands so that these lands can be exploited for their commercial value and the indigenous people can be “freed” to become wage labour.
10,000 Indigenous Peoples Displaced
Thus, even though the accursed Bakun dam had been suspended in 1997 due to the financial crisis, the government still went ahead to displace 10,000 indigenous peoples to the Sungai Asap resettlement camp in 1998. Well, if this could stand for a reason - the contract for the Sg Asap camp had already been given out to a multinational company! The whole Bakun area which is the size of the island of Singapore had been thoroughly logged…
And all this happened while Dr Mahathir was the Prime Minister. Was he a liability to the BN government then?
I was part of the fact-finding mission to Sg Asap in 1999 and even then we could see the destruction of so many unique indigenous communities and their cultures, including the Ukits. There was only one word to describe what had been done to these indigenous peoples and their centuries old cultures…WICKED!
Banned From My Own Country!
As a result of my concern for the indigenous peoples and the natural resources of Sarawak, I was told at Kuching airport in August 2007 that I could not enter Sarawak! So much for 1Malaysia! So much for national integration! So much for nearly fifty years of independence! I was not welcome in my own country!
But the contracts for the resettlement scheme and the logging are chicken feed compared to the megabucks to be reaped from the mega dams. Even before the Bakun dam ever got started, Malaysian tax payers had to compensate Ekran Bhd and the other “stakeholders” close to RM1 billion in 1997!
How much does it cost to pay our mata-mata to investigate the scandalous rape of our Penan women?
The contracts from building the Bakun dam and the undersea cable run in excess of RM20 billion. Malaysian taxpayers won’t know the final cost until they are told the cost overruns when the projects have been completed.
But if the PKFZ scandal is anything to go by, the leaks and non-accountability all along the line will result in Malaysian tax payers paying millions for the same kind of daylight robbery.
In the early nineties, when the Government was trying to assure us that there would be no irresponsible logging in Sarawak, I pointed out in Parliament that if the Government could not monitor the Bukit Sungai Putih permanent forest and wild life reserve just ten minutes from Kuala Lumpur, how did they expect us to believe they could monitor the forests in Bakun?
Likewise today, if the Government cannot monitor a project in Port Klang just half an hour from Kuala Lumpur, how can they assure us that they can monitor a project deep in upriver Sarawak and through 650 kilometres of the South China Sea?
How can we be assured that we will get to the bottom of politically linked scandals when the Sarawak police tell us they don’t have the resources to investigate the rape of Penan women and girls?
How can we be assured that the Sarawak state government cares about its indigenous peoples and its natural resources when NGO activists are banned from entering Sarawak to investigate a part of their own country?
Bakun Dam Does Not Make Economic Sense
In 1980, the Bakun dam was proposed with a power generating capacity of 2400 MW even though the projected energy needs for the whole of Sarawak was only 200MW for 1990. The project was thus coupled with the proposal to build the world’s longest (650 km) undersea cable to transmit electricity to the peninsula. An aluminium smelter at Bintulu was also proposed to take up the surplus energy.
In 1986, the project was abandoned because of the economic recession although the then Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir announced just before the UN Conference on Environment & Development at Rio that this was “proof of Malaysia’s commitment to the environment” (NST, 13.6.90)
So what happened to that commitment, Dr Mahathir?
In 1993, with the upturn in the Malaysian economy, the Government once again announced the revival of the Bakun HEP project. To cushion the expected protests, the Energy Minister Samy Vellu gave Parliament a poetic description of a “series of cascading dams” and not one large dam as had been originally proposed. Before long, it was announced that the Bakun dam would be a massive 205-metre high concrete face rockfill dam, one of the highest dams of its kind in the world and it would flood an area the size of Singapore Island. The undersea cable was again part of the project. There was also a plan for an aluminium plant, a pulp and paper plant, the world’s biggest steel plant and a high-tension and high-voltage wire industry.
Have feasibility studies been done to see if there will be adequate local, regional and international demand for all these products?
In 1999, after the economy had recovered, the Government again announced that the project would be resumed albeit on a smaller scale of 500MW capacity.
Before long in 2001, the 2400MW scale was once again proposed although the submarine cable had been shelved. Today we read reports about the government and companies still contemplating this hare-brained scheme which is now estimated to cost a whopping RM21 billion!
Displacing 1000 More Indigenous People
The recent announcement that the Sarawak government intends to build two more mega dams in Sarawak apart from the ill-fated Bakun dam is cause for concern. It is a cause for grave concern. Malaysian tax payers, Malaysian forests and Malaysian indigenous peoples will again be the main victims of this misconceived plan. We have been told that some 1000 more indigenous peoples will have to be displaced from their ancestral lands to make way for these two dams.
Apart from the human cost, ultimately it will be the Malaysian consumers who pay for this expensive figment of the Chief Minister’s wild imagination. Enough tax payers’ money has been wasted - Sarawak Hidro has already spent some RM1.5 billion on the project.

Obfuscatory Statistics on Energy Demand

Right now, the country is being fed conflicting reports about energy demand. There is supposed to be a 43% oversupply of electricity capacity in peninsula Malaysia. Experienced Bakun dam watchers will tell you such conflicting and mutually contradictory assertions have been used by the dam proponents to justify every flip flop of this misconceived project.
Apart from the economic cost and the wastage, how are investors supposed to plan for the long-term and medium term? What is the long-term plan for Bakun? Can Bakun compete with the rest of the world or for that matter, Indonesia?
Aluminium smelters to take up the bulk of Bakun electricity have been mentioned ever since the conception of the Bakun dam project because they are such a voracious consumer of energy. Even so, has there ever been any proper assessment of the market viability of such a project with the cheaper operating costs in China?
Does it matter that the co-owner of one of the smelters is none other than Cahaya Mata Sarawak (CMS) Bhd Group that is controlled by Chief Minister Taib’s family business interest?
Clearly, Bakun energy and Sarawak’s tin pot governance do not give confidence to investors. First it was Alcoa, and then Rio Tinto also had second thoughts about investing in Sarawak.

Damn the Dams

Concerned NGOs have all along called for the abandonment of this monstrous Bakun dam project because it is economically ill-conceived, socially disruptive and environmentally disastrous. The environmental destruction is evident many miles downstream since the whole Bakun area has been logged by those who have already been paid by Sarawak Hidro.
The social atrophy among the 10,000 displaced indigenous peoples at Sungei Asap resettlement scheme remains the wicked testimony of the Mahathir/Taib era. The empty promises and damned lives of the displaced peoples as forewarned by the Concerned NGOs in 1999 have now been borne out.
The economic viability of the Bakun dam project has been in doubt from the beginning and the announcement to build two more dams merely reflects a cavalier disregard for the indigenous peoples, more desecration of Sarawak’s natural resources and a blatant affront to sustainable development.
Love, light & liberation,
soong's possible

Indonesia must repeal "cruel" new stoning and caning law

Indonesia must repeal "cruel" new stoning and caning law

17 September 2009
A new Indonesian bylaw that endorses stoning to death for adultery and caning of up to 100 lashes for homosexuality should be repealed immediately, Amnesty International said on Thursday.

The local Islamic Criminal Code was passed by the Aceh Provincial House of Representatives on Monday. It forbids a number of acts including alcohol consumption, gambling, intimacy between unmarried couples, adultery and fornication, and homosexuality.

"The new criminal bylaw flies in the face of international human rights law as well as provisions of the Indonesian constitution," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific director.

"Stoning to death is particularly cruel and constitutes torture, which is absolutely forbidden under all circumstances in international law."

Indonesia’s central government has indicated that the law may contravene Indonesia’s existing human rights protections under the country’s constitution.

"We welcome the concerns expressed by different levels of the Indonesian government about these laws," Zarifi said. "But the proof is in the doing, and as long as these laws stay on the books they pose a serious threat to Indonesia’s international human rights obligations."

Some of these provisions, particularly punishment by caning, are not new in Aceh and already violate international human rights standards on cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

However, this is the first time that local legislators have included stoning to death (rajam) as a penalty for those who commit adultery. International human rights law and standards oppose the extension of the death penalty to new crimes.

Amnesty International has urged Aceh's newly elected legislature, due to take office in October, to repeal the law as matter of urgent priority.

Amnesty International has also called on the new legislature to ensure that all local regulations in Aceh are in full conformity with international human rights law and standards, and other human rights provisions set out in the Indonesian Constitution and in the 1999 Law on Human Rights.

The Indonesian government should ensure that the decentralization process and regional autonomy does not come at the expense of human rights.

Local Islamic Law was gradually put in place in Aceh from 1999-2000 through various autonomy packages. Caning was introduced a few years ago as a punishment meted out by Islamic courts for offences such as gambling, theft and adultery. At least 31 men and four women convicted of gambling were caned under local Islamic law in Aceh in 2005 and at least eight people (five men and three women) convicted for gambling or adultery were caned in 2006.

SUARAM HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD 2009

Call for Nominations

SUARAM HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD 2009

Deadline: 15 November 2009

In conjunction with SUARAM’s 20th Anniversary Celebration, we invite you to send in nominations for the 11th Annual SUARAM Human Rights Award.

Initiated in 1999 on the 10th anniversary celebration of SUARAM, this annual award seeks to give recognition to local communities and collectives in their outstanding and inspiring endeavours to protect and promote human rights activism in Malaysia.

This year, 10 years after the inaugural award was presented in 1999, SUARAM once again calls for nominations for this award, which will be presented at SUARAM’s “20 Years Defending Human Rights” Dinner on 6 December 2009.

Previous winners

Previous winners have been diverse in their causes, but all of them have overcome tremendous hardships and tribulations in the fight for human rights. Winners in previous years were:-

1999: The people of Kampung Sungai Nipah

2000: The Reformasi Movement

2001: Save Our Schools Damansara and wives of ISA detainees (joint winners);

2002: Police Watch & Human Rights Committee

2003: The former plantation workers’ community of Ladang Braemar

2004 The Kuala Kuang villagers and the workers of Euromedical Industries (joint winners);

2005: The Temuan Orang Asli Community from Kampung Bukit Tampoi in Dengkil

2006: the Chin Refugee Committee and the Bukit Jelutong plantation community (joint winners).

2007: The Coalition against Healthcare Privatisation and the residents of Kampung Sungai Terentang, Rawang (joint winners)

2008: The Penan community of Ulu Baram, Sarawak and the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) (joint winners)

Guidelines

The guidelines are listed as below:-

  1. ELIGIBILITY
  • Only communities or groupings of people are eligible for nominations. Nomination of an individual will not be accepted.
  • Nominations of family members of the SUARAM secretariat and staff will not be accepted.
  1. NOMINATIONS
  • Nominations will be received from any party, be it from individuals or organizations.
  • The nominating party is required to complete the Nomination Form in the languages of English, Malay, Chinese or Tamil.
  • Supporting Documentation is to be in the languages of English, Malay, Chinese and/or Tamil. These can be photographs, videos, newspaper clippings, newsletter etc.
  • The Nomination Form is to be sent with supporting documentation to SUARAM, via fax, email and/or postal mail.

  1. CLOSING DATE
  • Nominations will be closed on 15 November 2009.

  1. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
  • Community or group of people which has struggled persistently and fearlessly in defending their rights, justice and dignity against oppression.
  • Organization and leadership of the people which has empowered and activated their people in the process of struggle and to continue in their efforts to promote and protect human rights.

  1. SELECTION AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF WINNER
  • A panel of judges comprising individuals who have been involved in human rights work in the country will select the award winner.
  • The winner will be announced on at SUARAM’s “20 Years Defending Human Rights” Dinner on 6 December 2009.

  1. PRIZE FOR AWARD WINNER
  • The winner will receive a prize money of RM2,000.00 and a specially-commissioned glass trophy designed by renowned artist Wong Hoy Cheong.

For further enquiries, please contact John Liu (tel +603 7784 3525 / 7783 5724; fax +603 7784 3526; or email suaram20years@gmail.com).


SUARAM HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD 2009

Nomination Form

I. Nominee

Name of community / group of people: _________________________

Address: _________________________________________________

Contact Person & Phone No: _________________________________

II. Please answer each of the following questions on a separate sheet of paper and include with this nomination form.

  1. Profile of nominee

Please describe the background and composition of the community or group of people that you are nominating. Also, please describe the activities, actions and/or programs for which recognition is being sought. Please attach supporting documentation.

(No less than 300 words, excluding supporting documentation. There is no limit for supporting documentation.)

  1. Justification

Please describe how the activities, actions and/or programs relate to the purpose of the Human Rights Award.

Please state clearly how the activities, actions and/or prograams of the community or group of people that you are nominating fulfill each of the following criteria:

i. The persistence in their struggle to defend their rights, justice and dignity against oppression.

ii. The fearlessness in their struggle to defend their rights, justice and dignity against oppression.

iii. The extent of which their work has empowered their people to continue the efforts to promote and protect human rights.

(No less than 200 words)

III. Send this completed nomination form and supporting documents by 15 November 2009 to:

SUARAM

Subject: SUARAM Human Rights Award 2009

Address: 433A, Jalan 5/46, Gasing Indah, 46000 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan

Tel: 03-77843525

Fax: 03-77843526

Email: suaram20years@gmail.com

IV. Submitted by:

Name: ________________________________________________

Organization Name: _____________________________________

Address: ______________________________________________

Tel: _______________________ Fax: ______________________

Email: ________________________________________________

Date: ______________________ Signature: __________________

SARAWAK STATE GOVERNMENT NOT LISTENING TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

JOAS MEDIA RELEASE

17 September 2009

SARAWAK STATE GOVERNMENT NOT LISTENING TO INDIGENOUS PEOPLES

Kuching, Sarawak. On the day that Malaysia was formed, 15 indigenous peoples who stood for four hours outside the Chief Minister’s office on behalf of longhouses and villages in Sarawak that would be affected by two proposed dams were arrested outside the office of the Chief Minister as they waited to submit a simple memorandum. Among those arrested were JOAS leaders Mark Bujang (BRIMAS), Raymond Abin (SCAN) and Hellan Empaing (WADESA) who were there in support of the Penan, Iban, Kayan and Kenyah representatives of the affected communities.

"We came to Kuching city to give a memo to the Chief Minister because we were not happy with the Murum Dam construction. If this continues, our lands will drown, and how are we supposed to live and survive? This memo contains our concerns so that the state government can listen to our worries." said Sui Along, Penan representative from Long Luar, a village in the affected area of Murum.

The police arrested the 15 after receiving a call from the Chief Minister’s office. After being held for seven hours without food and water by local police, they were charged with illegal assembly and released on bail. They will be expected to appear in court on 29 September 2009.

The proposed Murum dam is the first of 12 new proposed dams to be built throughout Sarawak. Quickly announced by the government after NGOs found plans on these dams on internet websites of the Chinese contractors, these dams were planned without prior consultation of the affected communities, let alone the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples on whose lands these dams would be built. In its inception, the still constructed and highly controversial Bakun dam was touted as being able to supply the energy needs of Malaysia, bringing into question the need for an additional 12 dams.

Rubbishing state leader claims that local NGOs had instigated the incident, BRIMAS Executive Director Mark Bujang said that they had responded to the communities because no one else wanted to listen. “We brought these remote communities together in Kuching to discuss their common concerns. For many of them, this was the first time they had come down to the city centre and they stated to us they wanted their concerns to be heard by representatives of the government and so we lent moral support to them.”

SCANE Director Raymond Abin said that when the representatives of the local government refused to listen, the communities wanted to come to Kuching. “Now that we have come all the way here to where our government leaders are, they still refuse to listen to us,” he said. “This questions their sincerity in saying they are concerned about listening to the indigenous peoples of Sarawak.”

JOAS President Adrian Lasimbang said the arrest and blatant intimidation of the indigenous peoples showed clearly the lack of commitment by the state government to internationally recognized frameworks of consent and consultation that form part of the collective rights of indigenous peoples and added that “In solidarity with JOANGOHUTAN, we support the call to the EU to suspend FLEG negotiations with Malaysia in view of the flagrant disregard of the government for free, prior informed consent and consultation with communities affected by logging and by development projects. We additionally call for the Malaysian government to review its policies to ensure that international law, especially those concerning human rights and the rights of indigenous peoples, is mainstreamed.” This violation is contradictory to article 32 (2) of the UNDRIP that stated States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilization or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources.

The full list of indigenous peoples detained are: Mark Bujang (Executive Director of Borneo Research Institute, BRIMAS), Hellan Empaing (President of Wanita Desa Sarawak, WADESA), Dominic Ng, Johannes Ya, Rukka anak Laku, Philan Yau, Nan Evan, Simon Saging, Ramly anak Datuk, Abin Bira, Sui Alloh, Nang Buleng, Panai Irang, Bujang Dalong, and Koleh Ngo.

BRIMAS – Borneo Resources Institute, Sarawak’s leading NGO and supporting NGO to JOAS

SCANE – Sarawak Conservation Network, a coalition of leading environmental and indigenous rights organizations in Sarawak

JOANGOHUTAN – Network of Indigenous Peoples and NonGovernmental Oragnizations on Forest Issues

WADESA – Sarawak Native Women’s Association

For more information, please contact:

Jen Rubis

Media Liaison

jen.rubis@gmail.com

+60198566251